A friend of mine told me of a time that he took his young son to a mall, where the child
saw something he wanted dad to buy for him. His dad explained that he didn’t have enough money left for the purchase. Undaunted, the youngster said, “Then just go and buy some more money.”
Kids, they do say the darndest things.
I thought my friend’s anecdote amusing when I first heard it; now, seemingly years into the current campaign to see who will replace George W. Bush as the next occupant of the White House, it’s not so funny anymore.
Recent reports show that the combined costs of the campaigns for the major candidates will shatter previous election cycles and, as we all well know, the four-year salary (and benefits) paid to the Leader of the Free World can’t come close to covering these expenses.
I can see it playing out at our house: “Honey, I have great news. An executive search firm found me a job. It pays $200,000 a year for the first four years, with an option for another four years. But then I have to leave and I can never have the job again. Oh, and I only have to pay them $100 million up front and they’ll let me know if I have to pony up any more before I start.”
Nothing real funny here, especially when we consider that the President, in cooperation (and I use that term loosely) with Congress, often is expected to fix our ailing economy by, among other initiatives, returning tax money to us to encourage more trips to the mall.
Wouldn’t it be easier for us to just go and buy some more money?
Anyway, since I have a vested interest in health care, I been thinking lately that even a child could see a disconnect between the amount of money Presidential candidates spend and the high cost of healthcare coverage. Few decent, compassionate people disagree in principle with the concept that a country as blessed as ours should provide some form of healthcare coverage to all. But the challenge to making this a reality—and thus freeing the government to pursue other important issues, like did the New England Patriots really tape their opponents—is how to pay for it.
Assuming we can’t just buy some money and there really are rules amount how much the government can print, I’d like to toss out the beginnings of an idea that, with some spit-balling, brainstorming, and story boarding over a few months during which we can hold a series of mind numbing retreats (Can you tell I’ve had management training?) I believe we can flesh out into a workable course of action.
It starts with all the viable candidates calculating exactly how much they expect to spend on their Presidential campaigns and sending a check in that amount … to me.
What I will do is take that cumulative amount—minus some modest but fair percentage for my trouble—and put it in an account to cover every Americans’ healthcare costs. If that runs out, we’ll hold a Telethon, asking Americans to donate so that we can eliminate a terrible national malady: chronic and excessive Presidential campaigns. When we explain the added benefit of knocking most political pundits off the radio and TV, I’m sure the money will roll in.
But who gets to be President, you ask? I haven’t put the finishing touches on that part of my plan yet, but I’m thinking of somehow working it in with Dancing with the Stars. Unlike most Presidential debates, Americans actually seem to tune in for that show.
Posted by hospitalnews
Posted by hospitalnews
Posted by hospitalnews